[AI + WEB2 + WEB3 AUDIT PLATFORM][AGENTIC SECURITY READY][WALLET + API + SUPPLY CHAIN AWARE]

The Trust Audit for the Agentic Build Era.

Vibe-Coded Is Not Verified.

AI can build the app. It should not be the only thing verifying it.

The same model that helped create your application may tell you it is secure based on its own limited definition of “secure.” GRID adds the independent audit layer modern teams need before users, partners, investors, or communities are asked to trust an AI-built product.

Our VINE MIND SWARM maps exposed surfaces, agent permissions, API behavior, wallet-signing flows, secrets, dependencies, generated code, and abuse paths — then human reviewers validate what actually matters.

Trust-Boundary Coverage

Prompt injection, MCP/tool permissions, model-cost abuse, exposed secrets, dependency risk, and wallet-signing clarity are first-class audit surfaces.

Multichain Ready

Adapter-based Web3 review across XRPL, Xahau, Evernode, Hedera/HBAR, EVM contracts, Sui, Midnight, and future chains.

01 — CONTEXT

Why This Matters Now

AI has changed how applications are built. Teams are shipping faster with Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Replit, Lovable, Bolt, custom agents, MCP tools, and generated code. That speed creates a new trust gap: apps can look finished before their permissions, APIs, wallets, data flows, and agent actions are properly understood.

GRID audits that gap. We look beyond whether the app runs. We test what it exposes, what it trusts, what it can spend, what it can sign, what it can leak, and what an attacker can convince it to do.

If a team cannot inventory it, they cannot secure it.

02 — SWARM

Discovery, Expansion, Analysis.

A simplified view of the VINE MIND SWARM in motion: seed URLs flow into discovery, discovery agents fan back into the crawler to expand the page set, then a parallel battery of analysis agents reviews the full surface and consolidates into a single report. The counts below are live from the catalogue.

Live swarm0 agents0 pillars0 verified
SeedsPhase 0 · DiscoveryPhase 1 · SwarmPage SetPhase 2 · AnalysisPhase 3 · ReportDiscoveryAPI MapperBundle MinerForm DiscoveryAuth SurfaceWeb3 SignalsSource MapsFrontendAPI & TrustInfrastructureData & SecretsGatewayAI & AgenticSmart Contract & Web3XRPLReport
Seeds·Agent·Fanout·Swarm-back·Consolidate
Topology illustrative · agent & pillar counts live from the catalogue
02 — COVERAGE

What Grid Reviews

Security Pillar

AI, Agentic & MCP Security

Prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, agent goal hijacking, MCP/tool poisoning, excessive agency, model-cost denial of wallet, AI output-to-action risk, memory/RAG leakage, and over-permissioned tools across applications built by or powered by AI agents.

Security Pillar

API, Webhook & Trust-Boundary Security

Multi-source endpoint discovery, broken object and field-level authorization, input handling and injection paths, GraphQL behavior, rate limiting, error disclosure, file-handling routes, and exposed configuration detection.

Security Pillar

Wallet, Transaction & Web3 Flow Validation

Transaction-intent verification — what the UI says will happen vs what the payload actually does. Trust lines, token flags, issuer controls, NFT flows, escrows, multisig, OfferCreate, and signing-prompt clarity for XRPL, Xahau, Evernode, EVM, Sui, and Midnight wallets.

Security Pillar

Identity, Session & Access Control

Cookie attributes, session fixation, token handling, OAuth/OIDC discovery and redirect handling, signup/login/reset surfaces, authenticated crawl coverage, IDOR/JWT follow-up, and credential exposure behind client-approved sessions.

Security Pillar

Data, Secrets, RAG & Supply Chain Exposure

Hardcoded API keys, XRPL seeds and mnemonics, .env and source-map leakage, debug surfaces, exposed cloud-storage references, vector-store and embedding endpoint exposure, dependency-confusion and typosquat candidates, and CI/CD provenance gaps across the build pipeline.

Security Pillar

Frontend, Infrastructure & Public Attack Surface

Full-depth page crawl across dynamically-rendered SPA routes and multi-host portfolios, SSL/TLS, HTTP security headers, open ports, subdomain enumeration and dangling-DNS exposure, CORS, edge/CDN behavior, cache poisoning, and server configuration hardening.

Security Pillar

Business Logic, Abuse Paths & Workflow Integrity

State-transition review across critical flows: payment, signup, claim, whitelist, airdrop, referral, escrow, and multisig. Concurrent-request races, IP-rotation rate-limit bypass, and WAF evasion against the parts of the app where the math works but the rules can be gamed.

Security Pillar

Multichain Adapter Readiness

Read-only chain adapters for XRPL, Xahau, Evernode, Hedera/HBAR, EVM (Ethereum, Polygon, BSC, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche), Sui, and Midnight — plus an extensible adapter framework for new chain-specific review lanes as ecosystems mature.

03 — BOUNDARIES

What Grid Does Not Do

No Custody or Asset Control

GRID does not take custody of funds, request private keys, or require control over project wallets. Wallet and transaction reviews are performed through safe, read-only, or explicitly approved validation methods.

Tokenomics Auditing

We do not review economic models, token distribution, or financial mechanisms.

Financial Advice

Grid does not provide investment advice or compliance guidance.

Destructive Testing

We perform only safe, passive checks without disrupting your application.

Guaranteed Security

No audit can guarantee complete security or eliminate all risks.

04 — CREDENTIALS

Why Grid Is Qualified to Audit Your Application

0
Swarm Agents
0
Security Pillars
0+
Years Experience
Enterprise IT Background

20+ years in enterprise infrastructure, security architecture, and risk assessment across Fortune 500 environments — the operator's view of what real production exposure looks like.

AI, Web2 & Web3 Coverage

Deep coverage across AI agents and MCP-style tooling, modern web application surfaces, and Web3 wallet / signing flows on XRPL, Xahau, Evernode, Hedera/HBAR, EVM, Sui, and Midnight. One audit, one report, every chain.

Coordinated Swarm + Human Review

The GRID VINE MIND SWARM runs 78 specialist agents in coordinated phases — discovery, expansion, and parallel analysis — while human reviewers validate findings, remove noise, and turn raw signal into decisions a project team can act on.

Remediation Partnership

Grid does not hand over a report and disappear. We work directly with the project team through remediation, answer implementation questions, and validate fixes until the application is ready to pass.

Standards-Aligned Methodology

Methodology aligned with OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Security Top 10, OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP CI/CD Top 10, OWASP Smart Contract Top 10, NIST CSF, ISO 27001 control families, SLSA build provenance, and CISA's SBOM-for-AI minimum elements — adapted for AI, Web2, and Web3 applications.

Phase 2: On-Demand Swarm Access

After verification, Phase 2 will let approved project agents interact with the GRID VINE MIND SWARM and initiate on-demand scans whenever meaningful code, infrastructure, or workflow changes are introduced.

05 — SCOPE

What We Review

Every engagement starts with full-surface discovery, then the GRID VINE MIND SWARM and human reviewers assess the live application across eight security pillars spanning Web2, authenticated application workflows, and Web3 wallet or ledger integrations. Open any pillar to see what we validate and the standards it maps to — without publishing the full internal playbook behind every audit.

Client-side behavior, browser trust boundaries, and user-facing attack surface.

Client-side exposure and trust-boundary review
Browser security-control validation
Unsafe rendering and redirect-risk assessment
Session and user-flow protection checks
OWASP Top 10OWASP ASVSCSP / Trusted Types

Service-layer review focused on authorization, input handling, and exposed integration risk.

Endpoint discovery and exposure mapping
Broken object & field-level authorization (BOLA / BOPLA)
Input handling and trust-boundary validation
Third-party integration and transport security
OWASP API Security Top 10OWASP Top 10BOLA / BOPLA

Server, hosting, and environment hardening across the exposed infrastructure surface.

Transport, certificate, and header hygiene
Service exposure and configuration review
Administrative surface and hardening checks
Operational dependency and environment-risk analysis
NIST CSFCIS BenchmarksTLS / transport hygiene

Secrets, artifacts, sensitive-data handling, and build-pipeline provenance.

Credential and secret exposure review
Build artifact and source-map leakage checks
Dependency-confusion and typosquat candidates
CI/CD provenance gaps across the build pipeline
OWASP CI/CD Top 10SLSA provenanceCISA SBOM-for-AI

Authentication boundaries, gateway behavior, and network-layer control validation.

Identity, session, and gateway control review
Rate limiting and abuse-resilience validation
Proxy, load-balancer, and edge behavior analysis
Network-level exposure and control checks
OWASP Top 10 — Access ControlNIST CSFAbuse resilience

AI, agentic, and rapid-development risk across prompts, tools, autonomy, and generated output.

Prompt, context, and output-safety review
Agent autonomy and tool-permission controls
Model-facing secret and data-exposure checks
AI Bill of Materials (AIBOM) readiness
OWASP LLM Top 10OWASP Agentic threatsCISA SBOM-for-AI

Business-logic and transaction-flow review for critical actions, state changes, and signing.

Critical workflow and state-transition review
Transaction integrity and signing assumptions
Business-logic abuse-path assessment
High-impact workflow retest validation
OWASP Smart Contract Top 10Business-logic abuseState-transition integrity

Wallet flows, token behavior, transaction safety, and chain-specific trust assumptions.

Wallet, trust-line, and signing-flow validation
Transaction-intent verification — UI claims vs signed payload
Token and issuer behavior review
Multichain adapter readiness (XRPL, Xahau, EVM, Sui, Midnight…)
XRPL protocol standardsOWASP Smart Contract Top 10Signing-flow safety

Note:All testing is non-destructive and performed against live targets using safe, controlled methods. No credential brute-forcing, service disruption, or data modification is performed during Grid audits. Where authenticated review is in scope, it is run with explicit client approval and paired with remediation support.

06 — PROCESS

How It Works

01

Project Submission

Submit your Web3 or XRPL application through our secure intake form. We collect target URLs, GitHub repo, API base, and any context that helps scope the review.

02

Scope Definition

Our team reviews your submission and defines audit scope — which pillars apply, what intrusive checks (if any) are in scope, and what your risk tolerance is.

03

Automated Agent Scan

The GRID VINE MIND SWARM runs as a coordinated, multi-phase review: an initial discovery sweep maps your live attack surface across the target and any portfolio sites, specialist agents expand and refine that surface, then a parallel battery of analysis agents reviews the consolidated page set. Authenticated flows are exercised when approved. Findings collapse into a single report — the orchestration runs invisibly to the auditor.

04

Human Expert Review

Security professionals validate every finding, filter false positives, assess exploitability, and add context that automated tools alone cannot provide.

05

Risk-Scored Report

You receive a detailed report with findings organized by pillar and severity, evidence, remediation guidance, and an overall risk score.

06

Remediation Window

Grid works hand in hand with your project team to clarify findings, validate fixes, and re-scan important changes until the vulnerabilities that matter are closed and certification is ready.

07

Verification & Certification

Receive your Grid verification status and a public certification page your community can independently verify. Phase 2 will extend this with verified-project access for trusted project agents to trigger on-demand VINE MIND SWARM scans when changes ship.

07 — CERTIFICATION

Grid Certification Outcomes

Grid treats certification as a remediation path, not a pass-or-fail stunt. We work directly with project teams to close material findings, retest fixes, and move toward a status that can be publicly verified.

GRID — CONDITIONAL

Grid Conditional

Initial review completed with fixes or retests still in progress.

Criteria

Used when material findings remain open but the project is actively working through a documented remediation path with Grid.

GRID VERIFIED
Active

Grid Verified

Passed technical review after remediation and verification.

Criteria

Core security issues are resolved, retested where needed, and the project is ready to publish a verifiable Grid status.

GRID ELITE

Grid Elite

Exceptional security posture with mature operating discipline.

Criteria

Reserved for teams that pair strong application security with operational maturity, hardening depth, and successful retest validation.

Start Your Grid Audit

We work hand in hand with your team through remediation, retesting, and verification so the vulnerabilities that matter get fixed before your status goes public.

Phase 2 will give verified projects a trusted way to let their own agents interact with the GRID VINE MIND SWARM and trigger on-demand scans whenever changes are made.